The Phenomenology of Inner Speech and the Diachronic Continuity of the Self

Caspar David Friedrich’s Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog (1818) — public domain. This version has been digitally edited by the author for illustrative purposes.

Inner speech—that subjective experience of silent, self-directed verbal thought—is recognized not merely as cognitive background noise but as a core component of human cognition, self-regulation, and identity formation. How, then, does this private dialogue sustain our sense of being the same person, moment after moment, year after year?

This article synthesizes recent literature from an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA)–informed perspective (a qualitative approach that explores how individuals make sense of their lived experiences), examines the diachronic continuity of the self (the ongoing sense of personal identity across time) and argues that inner dialogue functions as an internal narrative thread linking past, present, and future self-states. It offers a narrative synthesis rather than primary empirical findings.

Orientation note

For readers unfamiliar with key terms, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, or IPA, is a qualitative research approach that investigates how people interpret their lived experiences. The term “diachronic continuity of the self” refers to the sense of being the same individual over time, despite continuous psychological and situational change.

Decoding the Phenomenology and Structure of Inner Dialogue

IPA provides a powerful qualitative framework for investigating the lived experience of inner speech, focusing on personal narratives and meaning-making processes. This approach reveals that internal dialogue is not a monolithic concept; rather, it manifests in multiple forms and modes. As an idiographic qualitative approach, IPA illuminates meaning structures in depth but does not by itself establish population-level generalizability.

A critical nuance is the dialogic character of inner speech, often experienced as an internal conversation where different 'voices' or perspectives engage in constructive dialogue, aiding self-reflection and decision-making. Complementing this is evaluative or motivational inner speech, which involves self-directed commentary used to regulate emotions, bolster self-esteem, or trigger remedial cognitive processes. These functions are especially pertinent in clinical settings.

Furthermore, inner speech varies in its linguistic elaboration: Condensed inner speech denotes abbreviated, meaning-focused representations that omit phonological detail; expanded inner speech denotes fully articulated inner utterances with explicit phonological form.

Phonological loop (inner ear/inner voice). Source: Wikimedia Commons, CC0.

This differentiation is crucial because shifts between condensed and expanded forms may correspond to distinct cognitive demands; for instance, intricate problem-solving often requires shifting to expanded internal dialogue to organize thoughts deliberately. Experience sampling techniques have captured this phenomenological variability, demonstrating its link to context, task performance, and emotional state.

Finally, the experience of inner speech extends beyond mere linguistic content to include sensory qualities.

Individuals often report experiencing internal dialogue not just as a silent thought, but as "inner hearing," complete with perceived qualities such as timbre, volume, and intonation analogous to external speech. Understanding the distinction between inner speaking (active generation) and inner hearing (passive reception) is central to self-monitoring processes and holds profound implications for clinical presentations where self–other boundaries become blurred.

Inner Speech as the Anchor of Diachronic Self-Continuity

The diachronic continuity of the self is the perception that we remain the same person despite the continuous flux of psychological states and experiences. Inner speech is pivotal in maintaining this stability.

It achieves this by functioning as an internal narrative that actively links the past, present, and future self. Through reflective self-talk, individuals reconstruct personal narratives, integrating autobiographical memories with anticipatory plans, thereby fostering an ongoing sense of self-coherence. This internal narrative, often incorporating motivational and evaluative components, serves to anchor the self-concept, creating a continuous thread throughout one’s life history.

In-depth qualitative interviews conducted using IPA indicate that inner dialogue is a tool for reconciling changes in identity and maintaining a stable self-concept amid life transitions. Individuals use inner speech to revisit earlier life events, reinterpret their meanings, and reconcile these memories with current self-concepts. The inherently dialogic nature of inner speech further supports this continuity by allowing for the coexistence and integration of diverse self-aspects over time.

Integrating Subjective Experience with Neural Grounding

A significant strength of this approach is its ability to bridge the gap between subjective experience and objective neurobiological findings, a central tenet of neurophilosophy.

Schematic of the experimental design. (Hurlburt RT et al., PLOS ONE 2016, CC BY 4.0). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147932.g001

Neurobiological Support: Neuroimaging studies support the view that internal dialogue is an active neurocognitive process, not just a passive by-product. The production and monitoring of inner speech involve cortical regions such as the left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior temporal regions. These areas, associated with language processing and executive function, provide a neurofunctional substrate that links the phenomenology of inner speech with its role in sustaining self-continuity.

Beta-values extracted from brain regions associated with auditory perception (Heschl’s gyrus) and speech production (left inferior frontal gyrus). Source: Hurlburt RT et al., PLOS ONE 2016, CC BY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147932.g002

The Role of Predictive Coding: Neuroimaging findings enrich the phenomenological narrative by providing an empirical grounding for internal monitoring. When we generate inner speech, the brain employs predictive coding, generating an "efference copy" to predict and attenuate the sensory consequences of the self-generated speech. This mechanism is widely considered important for self-awareness and self-monitoring, which are critical for the diachronic continuity of the self. The convergence of IPA descriptions and quantitative neuroimaging data thus creates a holistic understanding of how inner speech is regulated at both subjective and neural levels.

Efference copy and prediction (forward model) scheme. Source: Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA).

Fragmentation of Inner Speech and Its Clinical Consequences

Disturbances in inner speech are intimately linked to psychopathological conditions such as schizophrenia and depression.

For instance, auditory verbal hallucinations are often conceptualized—within prominent accounts—as misattributed inner speech. Nonetheless, multi-factor accounts also implicate salience processing and memory-related intrusions. When the predictive coding mechanism fails or is disrupted, internal dialogue is misidentified as externally generated. This breakdown in neural mechanisms responsible for self-monitoring can profoundly disrupt self-continuity, contributing to the fragmentation of identity. Qualitative analyses reveal how patients describe these experiences; many report their internal voices as feeling alien or intrusive, undermining their sense of authorship and diminishing their continuity of self.

Clinical observations and qualitative reports indicate that disruptions in internal dialogue, such as excessive self-criticism or fragmented conversations, can lead to a fractured sense of self. In disorders like schizophrenia, patients report inner speech that is disorganized or comprised of multiple, conflicting voices, leading to a diminished sense of agency and self-coherence. These qualitative insights show that internal dialogue impairments disrupt the narrative thread that binds past experiences, current states, and future aspirations, thus impairing the self’s diachronic continuity.

Therapeutic Interventions for Reshaping Internal Dialogue

Recognizing inner speech as a mediator of identity and personal narrative highlights the potential for targeted therapeutic interventions.

Interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive inner speech, such as those used in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), have shown promise in restoring a more coherent internal dialogue and reinforcing self-continuity. CBT techniques frequently target negative, self-critical inner speech, seeking to transform it into more constructive and self-compassionate dialogue.

Additionally, narrative therapy, which focuses on the reconstruction of personal stories, benefits from IPA insights by directly addressing how fragmented internal dialogues can undermine a coherent life story. These therapeutic approaches underscore the crucial role inner speech plays in self-regulation and identity maintenance. Emerging practices integrating neurofeedback and mindfulness also show preliminary potential for modulating the neural circuits involved in inner speech, aiming to strengthen the internal dialogue central to maintaining a continuous self.

The Foundation of Selfhood

The interpretative phenomenological analysis of inner speech elucidates its complex, multilayered structure and its crucial role in maintaining the diachronic continuity of the self. The rich internal dialogue, in its dialogic, evaluative, and condensed dimensions, serves not only as a tool for everyday problem-solving but also as the continuous narrative thread binding a person’s existence.

This internal narrative, supported by stable neural mechanisms that facilitate self-monitoring, is indispensable for sustaining a coherent sense of identity over time. By integrating the subjective richness captured through IPA with the objective rigor of neuroimaging, this synthesis provides a holistic framework for understanding how inner speech functions as the foundation of personal identity. Future research must continue this interdisciplinary dialogue to deepen our understanding of the subtle interplay between language, thought, and identity, paving the way for clinical innovations that nurture a resilient, coherent self.

This discussion is not clinical advice.

---

References

1. Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology.Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 931–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021

2. Fanti Rovetta, F. The Dual Role of Inner Speech in Narrative Self-Understanding and Narrative Self-Enactment. Rev.Phil.Psych. 15, 975–995 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-023-00690-0

3. Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti, L. Rapin, J. P. Lachaux, Monica Baciu, Hélène Loevenbruck. What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural Brain Research, 2014, 261, pp.220-239. ff10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.034ff. ffhal-00967730f

4. (2016). interpretative phenomenological analysis. In D. Jackson, A. McDowall, K. Mackenzie-Davey, R. Whiting (Eds.) Interpretative phenomenological analysis (First Edition ed., Vol. 0, pp. -). SAGE Publications, Inc, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682823.n6

5. Machková, M. Enacting Inner Speech on the Academic Stage. A Dialogical Review on Fossa, P. (Ed.). (2022). New Perspectives on Inner Speech. Springer. Integr. psych. behav. 57, 1065–1083 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09739-8

6. Hurlburt RT, Alderson-Day B, Kühn S, Fernyhough C (2016) Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0147932. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0147932

7. Fuchs, T. Self across time: the diachronic unity of bodily existence. Phenom Cogn Sci 16, 291–315 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9449-4

8. Jorba, Marta & Vicente, Agustin. (2014). Cognitive Phenomenology, Access to Contents, and Inner Speech. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 21.

9. Rosen, C., Jones, N., Chase, K. A., Grossman, L. S., Gin, H., & Sharma, R. P. (2015). Self, Voices and Embodiment: A Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of schizophrenia research, 2(1), 1008.

10. Geurts, M. L. J. P. (2020). Talking some self into our senses: On the relationship between inner dialogue and self-consciousness (Bachelor’s thesis, Utrecht University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies).

11. Hélène Loevenbruck, Romain Grandchamp, Lucile Rapin, Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti, Cédric Pichat, et al.. Neural correlates of inner speaking, imitating and hearing: an fMRI study. ICPhS 2019 - 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aug 2019, Melbourne, Australia. ⟨hal-02367806⟩

12. Morin, A. (2011). Self‐awareness part 2: Neuroanatomy and importance of inner speech. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00410.x

13. Yeung, Jennie Dr. and Yeung, Jennie Dr., "A Qualitative Phenomenological Study Of Inner Speech Used As A Self-Help Tool Among Adult Remote Workers" (2024). Doctor of Education Program Dissertations. 33.

14. Phenomenology and the Role of Selfhood Disorders: Review Article. (2024). Journal of Pharma Insights and Research, 2(4), 088-098. https://doi.org/10.69613/b0rd2423

15. Waite, F., Knight, M. T., & Lee, D. (2015). Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism in Recovery in Psychosis: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Study. Journal of clinical psychology, 71(12), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22211

16. Klein, Stan. (2013). The sense of diachronic personal identity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 12. 10.1007/s11097-012-9285-8.